New California Law Prohibits Political Deepfakes
Should deepfake videos be considered protected speech?
California recently became the second state to pass a bill restricting the use of “deepfake” technology to spread false information about political candidates.
Specifically, the bill applies to instances where deepfake technology is used to intentionally spread false information about a candidate within 60 days of an election.
The bill includes exceptions for parody and satire, as well as cases where the broadcaster or publisher makes it clear that the media has been manipulated.
The bill has already drawn harsh criticism from free speech advocates, including the ACLU, who claimed "this bill will not solve the problem of deceptive political videos; it will only result in voter confusion, malicious litigation, and repression of free speech.”
It’s worth noting that libel and defamation have never been protected by the first amendment, and many deepfake videos could be classified as libel or defamation.
Do you think outlawing deepfake videos is an attack on the first amendment? Can we stop the spread of misinformation without relying on censorship? Let us know in the comments below.
One Big Thing: The Impact of COVID-19 on AfricaWhat is it? Many experts believe the virus will affect the African continent differently than the rest of the world. The African Quizzes
Coronavirus and the 2020 ElectionThe coronavirus outbreak continues to shut down businesses and stop people’s everyday lives which has raised a host of questions Quizzes
One Big Thing: The Economic Implications of CoronavirusWhat is it? As the Coronavirus pandemic continues to spread, its economic implications have been felt here in the United States
Quote of the WeekQuotes
A Call for MavericksOur nation’s founders were mavericks when they built a new type of government that sought to defend liberty and justice for all Short Video