Supreme Court Rules That The First Amendment Doesn’t Apply To Private Platforms.
Do you think the First Amendment should protect free speech on private platforms?
In a 5-4 split decision, the Supreme Court affirmed that First Amendment constraints don’t apply to private platforms. This means that private platforms, like social media companies, can censor content without violating free speech.
Notably, Justice Kavenaugh wrote:
"Providing some kind of forum for speech is not an activity that only governmental entities have traditionally performed...therefore, a private entity who provides a forum for speech is not transformed by that fact alone into a state actor."
This decision suggests that social media companies will not be considered state actors, and are therefore not bound by First Amendment anti-censorship protection. Do you think that social media companies should be allowed to censor your posts? Tell your congressional rep how you feel.
Taliban Rejects U.S. Cooperation Against ISIS-K in AfghanistanWhat’s the story? The U.S. and Taliban over the weekend held their first formal talks since the American military withdrew from News
One Big Thing: 37K Afghan Evacuees to Be Resettled Around U.S. - How You Can HelpWhat’s the story? State Dept. data for the Afghan Placement and Assistance program obtained by the Associated Press and Axios
How do you plan on practicing Maverick voting?Almost two years ago, we made the call for Mavericks – people who challenge the status quo; people who defend the dignity of
Local News Source Guide - Western RegionArizona - AZ AZCentral New Mexico - NM Albuquerque Journal Oregon - OR The Oregonian Nevada - NV Las Vegas Review Journal
Ask the Expert - Episode 6: When can you expect to know the election result?As a part of the We Hold These Truths 2020 Election Center , the Ask the Expert Series with Trevor Potter will provide you with Short Video