Should Political Robo Calls Be Protected Under the First Amendment?
Do you think auto calls should be classified as protected speech?
Spam calls are annoying, but they may be an important part of a functioning democracy, at least according to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. A Montana judge recently ruled that part of an old Montana law is unconstitutional for banning robo calls that are "promoting a political campaign or any use related to a political campaign.”
The court reasoned that banning robo calls might severely damage campaigns with low funding and therefore posed a dangerous restriction on free speech.
It’s nice to see a court stick up for campaigns that don’t have access to Super PACs, even if it comes at the expense of a minor annoyance.
What do you think? Is this a win for free speech or a loss for privacy? Can it be both?
One Big Thing: Has Hungary Gone too Far in the Fight Against Coronavirus?What is it? On March 30, Hungary’s parliament voted to give nearly unlimited emergency powers to President Viktor Orban – a
Coronavirus and the 2020 ElectionThe coronavirus outbreak continues to shut down businesses and stop people’s everyday lives which has raised a host of questions Quizzes
One Big Thing: How will Refugees and Displaced Persons Deal with Coronavirus?What is it? While many of us deal with Coronavirus by self-isolating and social distancing, the 70 million displaced people do
Quote of the WeekQuotes
A Call for MavericksOur nation’s founders were mavericks when they built a new type of government that sought to defend liberty and justice for all Short Video