{"issues":[{"id":"quizzes","name":"Quizzes","slug":"quizzes","description":"","page_title":"","icons":{"black":"/assets/images/icons/default-black-issue-icon.svg","grey":"/assets/images/icons/default-grey-issue-icon.svg","white":"/assets/images/icons/default-white-issue-icon.svg"},"cover_image_url":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/m8q3wkaM/66e6ac/explore.jpg","is_following":false},{"id":"news","name":"News","slug":"news","description":null,"page_title":null,"icons":{"black":"/assets/images/icons/default-black-issue-icon.svg","grey":"/assets/images/icons/default-grey-issue-icon.svg","white":"/assets/images/icons/default-white-issue-icon.svg"},"cover_image_url":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/m8q3wkaM/66e6ac/explore.jpg","is_following":false},{"id":"legislation","name":"Legislation","slug":"legislation","description":null,"page_title":null,"icons":{"black":"/assets/images/icons/default-black-issue-icon.svg","grey":"/assets/images/icons/default-grey-issue-icon.svg","white":"/assets/images/icons/default-white-issue-icon.svg"},"cover_image_url":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/m8q3wkaM/66e6ac/explore.jpg","is_following":false},{"id":"quotes","name":"Quotes","slug":"quotes","description":"","page_title":"","icons":{"black":"/assets/images/icons/default-black-issue-icon.svg","grey":"/assets/images/icons/default-grey-issue-icon.svg","white":"/assets/images/icons/default-white-issue-icon.svg"},"cover_image_url":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/m8q3wkaM/66e6ac/explore.jpg","is_following":false}],"legislators":[],"articles":[{"title":"One Big Thing: Should the Washington Redskins change their name?","id":276,"slug":"276-big-thing-washington-redskins-change-name","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/276-big-thing-washington-redskins-change-name","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=276","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/276/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

What is it?

The Washington Redskins have begun an internal review of their team name and logo which have come under fire for negatively displaying Native American imagery. Many consider “Redskin” to be a racial slur and their logo to be culturally insensitive.
Other sports teams with Native American imagery now also have big choices to make regarding their names and logos. The Kansas City Chiefs, Atlanta Braves, Cleveland Indians and many others will have to decide if it is worth keeping their current branding.

Why is it important?

Despite growing public pressure on the Washington Redskins to change their name, owner Dan Snyder has come out publicly against any changes, maintaining that the name comes from the franchise’s “proud tradition and history”.
While many teams consider changing their names and logos to non-inflammatory things, some organizations have gone about it differently. Florida State University got permission from the Seminole Tribe beforehand and continues an open dialogue to ensure that their relationship remains mutually supportive.

What can you do?

Check out more resources and sign the petition to end the use of Native American mascots in sports

","user_id":1095,"cta_prompt":"Join us and take our poll","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"7.9.20","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/cf6c68/800.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/cf6c68/800.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/cf6c68/800.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/cf6c68/800.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/cf6c68/800.jpg"},"profile_id":4,"action_count":61,"html_content":"

What is it?

The Washington Redskins have begun an internal review of their team name and logo which have come under fire for negatively displaying Native American imagery. Many consider “Redskin” to be a racial slur and their logo to be culturally insensitive.
\nOther sports teams with Native American imagery now also have big choices to make regarding their names and logos. The Kansas City Chiefs, Atlanta Braves, Cleveland Indians and many others will have to decide if it is worth keeping their current branding.

Why is it important?

Despite growing public pressure on the Washington Redskins to change their name, owner Dan Snyder has come out publicly against any changes, maintaining that the name comes from the franchise’s “proud tradition and history”.\n
While many teams consider changing their names and logos to non-inflammatory things, some organizations have gone about it differently. Florida State University got permission from the Seminole Tribe beforehand and continues an open dialogue to ensure that their relationship remains mutually supportive.

What can you do?

Check out more resources and sign the petition to end the use of Native American mascots in sports

","comment_count":9,"issue_slugs":["quizzes"],"private":false,"created_at":"2020-07-09T21:31:55.335Z","status":"published","snippet":"What is it? The Washington Redskins have begun an internal review of their team name and logo which have come under fire for","share_count":4,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#9F1962","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":6,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2020-07-09T22:42:38.222Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["quizzes"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"One Big Thing: Do you think peace is achievable in Afghanistan? ","id":267,"slug":"267-big-thing-do-think-peace-achievable-afghanistan","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/267-big-thing-do-think-peace-achievable-afghanistan","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=267","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/267/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

What is it?

Earlier this week, new intelligence surfaced that Russia issued bounties to the Taliban to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan. Republicans and Democrats alike have demanded answers from the Trump Administration.
The humanitarian situation in Afghanistan continues to be plagued by insecurity, violence and restrictions of personal freedom. Citizens and activist are frequently the victims of continued terrorism in some of the country’s most populated cities.
Coronavirus has also hit Afghanistan whose healthcare system was not prepared to deal with the pandemic. Even in Kabul, hospital beds are in short supply and medical resources are scarce – largely weakened by decades of conflict.

Why is it important?

Nearly two decades ago, the United States invaded Afghanistan to put an end to the Taliban insurgency and has led to the United States’ longest war.
In February 2020, the U.S. agreed to a peace deal with the Taliban in Doha, Qatar. Unfortunately, many parts of this deal have not been upheld as Taliban violence has persisted.
Afghan women have gained many rights since the United States and coalition forces deposed the Taliban, but many worry that women’s rights will be eroded with the possible return of the Taliban to Afghan politics.
Recently, the U.S. has made plans to withdraw all military presence from the country by election day.

What can you do?

Understand the Afghanistan war timeline from the Council on Foreign Relations.
Learn more about human rights in Afghanistan from Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.

","user_id":1095,"cta_prompt":"Join us and take our poll","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"7.1.20","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/2ff890/Screen%20Shot%202020-07-01%20at%2010.01.15%20AM.png","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/2ff890/Screen%20Shot%202020-07-01%20at%2010.01.15%20AM.png","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/2ff890/Screen%20Shot%202020-07-01%20at%2010.01.15%20AM.png","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/2ff890/Screen%20Shot%202020-07-01%20at%2010.01.15%20AM.png","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/2ff890/Screen%20Shot%202020-07-01%20at%2010.01.15%20AM.png"},"profile_id":7,"action_count":92,"html_content":"

What is it?

Earlier this week, new intelligence surfaced that Russia issued bounties to the Taliban to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan. Republicans and Democrats alike have demanded answers from the Trump Administration.
The humanitarian situation in Afghanistan continues to be plagued by insecurity, violence and restrictions of personal freedom. Citizens and activist are frequently the victims of continued terrorism in some of the country’s most populated cities.
\nCoronavirus has also hit Afghanistan whose healthcare system was not prepared to deal with the pandemic. Even in Kabul, hospital beds are in short supply and medical resources are scarce – largely weakened by decades of conflict.

Why is it important?

Nearly two decades ago, the United States invaded Afghanistan to put an end to the Taliban insurgency and has led to the United States’ longest war.
In February 2020, the U.S. agreed to a peace deal with the Taliban in Doha, Qatar. Unfortunately, many parts of this deal have not been upheld as Taliban violence has persisted.
\nAfghan women have gained many rights since the United States and coalition forces deposed the Taliban, but many worry that women’s rights will be eroded with the possible return of the Taliban to Afghan politics.
Recently, the U.S. has made plans to withdraw all military presence from the country by election day.

What can you do?

Understand the Afghanistan war timeline from the Council on Foreign Relations.
Learn more about human rights in Afghanistan from Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.\n

","comment_count":15,"issue_slugs":["quizzes"],"private":false,"created_at":"2020-07-01T14:05:29.970Z","status":"published","snippet":"What is it? Earlier this week, new intelligence surfaced that Russia issued bounties to the Taliban to kill American soldiers in","share_count":6,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#9F1962","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":6,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2020-07-01T14:36:52.817Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["quizzes"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"FLASHBACK: Mavericks Needed","id":219,"slug":"219-flashback-mavericks-needed","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/219-flashback-mavericks-needed","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=219","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/219/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

Almost two years ago, we made the call for Mavericks – people who challenge the status quo; people who defend the dignity of all; and people who work in service of a cause greater than oneself. Thousands, maybe millions, have answered the call.

Today, we need mavericks more than ever before. We’re seeing so many answering the call: doctors, nurses, all hospital and healthcare workers, grocery store employees, delivery drivers, immigrant farm workers, EMTs, firefighters, police, sanitation workers, and our military. They’re stepping up to the call – working in service of a cause greater than themselves.

Watch the video and let us know who you think are the Mavericks in your community and beyond. Post your responses and videos here and/or on Twitter and Facebook pages and take the pledge if you haven’t already at https://www.mavericksneeded.org/.

","user_id":641,"cta_prompt":"Who are the Mavericks in your community?","cta_type":"record_video","cta_text":"Record Video","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"5.4.20","image_urls":{"small":"https://img.youtube.com/vi/QlNPLoI-F1o/0.jpg","medium":"https://img.youtube.com/vi/QlNPLoI-F1o/0.jpg","large":"https://img.youtube.com/vi/QlNPLoI-F1o/0.jpg","thumb":"https://img.youtube.com/vi/QlNPLoI-F1o/0.jpg","xsmall":"https://img.youtube.com/vi/QlNPLoI-F1o/0.jpg"},"profile_id":8,"action_count":5,"html_content":"

","comment_count":2,"issue_slugs":[],"private":false,"created_at":"2020-05-04T17:58:39.126Z","status":"published","snippet":"Almost two years ago, we made the call for Mavericks – people who challenge the status quo; people who defend the dignity of","share_count":0,"reaction_config_id":null,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2020-05-04T17:58:39.123Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":"https://www.youtube.com/embed/QlNPLoI-F1o","video_dimensions":[480,270],"video_aspect_ratio":"16x9","og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":[],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"Introducing the Diplomacy Caucus","id":119,"slug":"119-introducing-diplomacy-caucus","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/119-introducing-diplomacy-caucus","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=119","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/119/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

The ongoing impeachment hearings in Washington, DC have had the unintended consequence of dragging down the morale of America’s foreign service as U.S. diplomats have been caught up in the partisan crossfire. To remedy this, four members of congress, two Republicans and two Democrats, have announced the creation of the Diplomacy Caucus. The caucus will bring together lawmakers of both parties in the interest of strengthening the U.S. diplomatic corps through legislation. Do you feel that America’s public servants are being protected enough by Congress, or is the creation of this caucus a necessity?

Article: With State Department Under Fire, Lawmakers Form a Diplomacy Caucus

","user_id":898,"cta_prompt":"A bipartisan group of lawmakers are banding together to support America's diplomats","cta_type":"share","cta_text":"Share","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"12.4.19","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/ZBVBgDke/a2c50b/brandon-mowinkel-H2b1a5WNSW0-unsplash.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/ZBVBgDke/a2c50b/brandon-mowinkel-H2b1a5WNSW0-unsplash.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/ZBVBgDke/a2c50b/brandon-mowinkel-H2b1a5WNSW0-unsplash.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/ZBVBgDke/a2c50b/brandon-mowinkel-H2b1a5WNSW0-unsplash.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/ZBVBgDke/a2c50b/brandon-mowinkel-H2b1a5WNSW0-unsplash.jpg"},"profile_id":6,"action_count":6,"html_content":"

Article: With State Department Under Fire, Lawmakers Form a Diplomacy Caucus

","comment_count":1,"issue_slugs":["news"],"private":null,"created_at":"2019-12-04T19:22:29.919Z","status":"published","snippet":"The ongoing impeachment hearings in Washington, DC have had the unintended consequence of dragging down the morale of America’s","share_count":2,"reaction_config_id":null,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2019-12-04T19:22:29.917Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["news"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"People of Hong Kong Receive Leadership Award","id":114,"slug":"114-people-hong-kong-receive-leadership-award","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/114-people-hong-kong-receive-leadership-award","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=114","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/114/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

The second annual John McCain Prize for Leadership in Public Service has been awarded to the people of Hong Kong in recognition of their fight for democracy. The award, which was presented to the people of Lesbos, Greece, last year was presented this year to former lawmaker Emily Lau Wai-hing and activist Figo Chan Ho-wun on Saturday, November 23rd. The two accepted the award from Cindy McCain, the wife of late Senator John McCain, alongside the Halifax Security Forum, on behalf of all protesters in Hong Kong.

Giving this award to the people of Hong Kong makes the Halifax Security Forum—a network of international experts, academics, military officials, entrepreneurs and authors—the first international organization to recognize the struggles of the city’s people. This certainly comes at a delicate time: last week, the US Congress almost unanimously voted to pass the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act. This act would impose stricter monitoring of Hong Kong and, should any action be taken by the government to erode at the city’s freedoms, sanctions against China. President Trump, who has been in the process of working out a new trade deal with Beijing as a focal point of his re-election campaign, has yet to comment on whether he will sign the act into law or not.

In this context, the Halifax Forum’s recognition of the Hong Kongese could be seen as a challenge to Beijing itself. However, the Forum stands firm in its decision. Cindy McCain, who is also a board member of the Forum, said that she hopes “this tribute to those who are struggling for their rights in Hong Kong will encourage more people around the world to raise their voices in support of their cause, especially in my country’s government. They are fighting for something larger than themselves.”

Article: People of Hong Kong awarded 2019 John McCain Prize for Leadership in Public Service – an honour that comes at delicate time in US-China relations

","user_id":898,"cta_prompt":"Second annual John McCain Prize for Leadership and Public Service awarded to people of Hong Kong","cta_type":"contact_reps","cta_text":"Contact Reps","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"11.25.19","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/ZBVBgDke/84e01a/Screen%20Shot%202019-11-25%20at%2010.25.39%20AM.png","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/ZBVBgDke/84e01a/Screen%20Shot%202019-11-25%20at%2010.25.39%20AM.png","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/ZBVBgDke/84e01a/Screen%20Shot%202019-11-25%20at%2010.25.39%20AM.png","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/ZBVBgDke/84e01a/Screen%20Shot%202019-11-25%20at%2010.25.39%20AM.png","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/ZBVBgDke/84e01a/Screen%20Shot%202019-11-25%20at%2010.25.39%20AM.png"},"profile_id":5,"action_count":3,"html_content":"

Article: People of Hong Kong awarded 2019 John McCain Prize for Leadership in Public Service – an honour that comes at delicate time in US-China relations

","comment_count":1,"issue_slugs":["news"],"private":null,"created_at":"2019-11-25T15:26:21.848Z","status":"published","snippet":"The second annual John McCain Prize for Leadership in Public Service has been awarded to the people of Hong Kong in recognition","share_count":2,"reaction_config_id":null,"recipient_config":{"state":"","region":"country","geolocate":true,"select_path":"Contact Reps : Federal : Geolocate","lower_chamber":"house","upper_chamber":"senate","chamber_choice":"all","state_required":false,"default_message":"","chosen_legislators":[],"lower_chamber_name":"House","upper_chamber_name":"Senate"},"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2019-11-25T15:26:21.846Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["news"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"One Big Thing: Is Facebook systematically violating civil rights or protecting free speech?","id":275,"slug":"275-big-thing-facebook-systematically-violating-civil-rights-protecting-free-speech","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/275-big-thing-facebook-systematically-violating-civil-rights-protecting-free-speech","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=275","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/275/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

What is it?

A recent independent audit of Facebook’s civil rights record showed that it’s company strategy to prioritize free speech was unsustainable and failed to address issues of hatred, bigotry and manipulation on its Facebook and Instagram platforms.
This has been accompanied by the largest boycott on Facebook’s ads in history as over 1000 companies stopped paid advertising. Facebook’s leadership held a series of video conferences earlier this week with the boycotts organizers but both parties walked away seemingly dissatisfied.

Why is it important?

The new report describes Facebook’s current approach to civil rights as “reactive and peacemeal” and claims that the algorithm actually increases polarization and extreme content, particularly around hate speech, bigotry .
As the 2020 election looms, auditors urge Facebook to address these issues as they could have a long-lasting negative effect on U.S. democracy. Last month, Facebook, Twitter and Google testified to Congress that they are continuing to deal with foreign election meddlers who are using their platforms to sow distrust and widen societal cleavages.
The boycott has caught Facebook’s attention because of its impact on its revenue stream. This demonstrates the effectiveness of collective action to spur actionable change.

What can you do?

Check out more from the boycott organizers and Facebook’s response.
Check out some tips to make sure your privacy is protected on Facebook.

","user_id":1095,"cta_prompt":"Join us and comment to share your opinion","cta_type":"comment","cta_text":"Comment","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"7.8.20","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/9583f5/static.politico.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/9583f5/static.politico.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/9583f5/static.politico.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/9583f5/static.politico.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/9583f5/static.politico.jpg"},"profile_id":4,"action_count":47,"html_content":"

What is it?

A recent independent audit of Facebook’s civil rights record showed that it’s company strategy to prioritize free speech was unsustainable and failed to address issues of hatred, bigotry and manipulation on its Facebook and Instagram platforms.
This has been accompanied by the largest boycott on Facebook’s ads in history as over 1000 companies stopped paid advertising. Facebook’s leadership held a series of video conferences earlier this week with the boycotts organizers but both parties walked away seemingly dissatisfied.

Why is it important?

The new report describes Facebook’s current approach to civil rights as “reactive and peacemeal” and claims that the algorithm actually increases polarization and extreme content, particularly around hate speech, bigotry .
As the 2020 election looms, auditors urge Facebook to address these issues as they could have a long-lasting negative effect on U.S. democracy. Last month, Facebook, Twitter and Google testified to Congress that they are continuing to deal with foreign election meddlers who are using their platforms to sow distrust and widen societal cleavages.
The boycott has caught Facebook’s attention because of its impact on its revenue stream. This demonstrates the effectiveness of collective action to spur actionable change.

What can you do?

Check out more from the boycott organizers and Facebook’s response.\n
Check out some tips to make sure your privacy is protected on Facebook.

","comment_count":16,"issue_slugs":["quizzes"],"private":false,"created_at":"2020-07-08T20:36:54.657Z","status":"published","snippet":"What is it? A recent independent audit of Facebook’s civil rights record showed that it’s company strategy to prioritize free","share_count":7,"reaction_config_id":null,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2020-07-08T22:20:40.353Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["quizzes"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"One Big Thing: Do you support global worker protections and rights as COVID-19 impacts livelihoods?","id":236,"slug":"236-big-thing-do-support-global-worker-protections-rights-covid-19-impacts-livelihoods","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/236-big-thing-do-support-global-worker-protections-rights-covid-19-impacts-livelihoods","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=236","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/236/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

What is it?

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect everyday life across the globe, workers’ rights have come under fire. With stores, shops, and malls closing their doors to practice social distancing, there has been a global drop in demand for many everyday items. Down the supply chain, many of the workers who produce these items are being laid off, often without pay or compensation for the goods they already produced.
In Bangladesh, many garment manufacturers were not paid for the work they had already completed because of lower global demand. This has led to the firing or furlough of more than one million Bangladeshi garment workers since the start of COVID-19.
The Chinese government also forcibly relocated over 30,000 Muslim Uighurs to keep factories open in COVID-19 affected areas which reflects China’s complete disregard for worker’s rights.
Migrant workers have particularly been impacted by COVID-19. In India, an estimated 139 million internal migrant workers have been impacted. And cross-border migrants, numbering more than 160 million worldwide, have suffered as host countries have not provided adequate protections or deported them. This has been an acute problem in Middle Eastern countries.

Why is it important?

Low wage workers around the world in many sectors have been severely impacted by the sudden impact of COVID-19. Government and company responses have been varied depending on the country, but the most vulnerable of workers in the developing world fear not only for their jobs, but for food security and health.
During a public health crisis, maintaining workers’ rights is just as much the task of the government as it is the companies themselves. When demand unexpectedly drops, both parties should work together to find solutions which value their employees’ rights and compensates them fairly for work already completed.
Consumers should have an awareness of where and how their goods and services come from and adapt purchasing practices to fully respect understand workers’ rights.
Authoritarian regimes are using coronavirus as a means to limit basic rights – freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of the press. In places like Burma (Myanmar) and Cambodia, the governments and local industries are taking advantage of the crisis to suppress unions and workers.

What can you do?

Check out some of the companies with the best business practices and some companies with the worst.
Learn more on workers’ rights from Solidarity Center and the United Nations Global Compact

","user_id":1095,"cta_prompt":"Join us and take our poll","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"5.28.20","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/1d5f6d/protecting_migrants_welfare1.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/1d5f6d/protecting_migrants_welfare1.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/1d5f6d/protecting_migrants_welfare1.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/1d5f6d/protecting_migrants_welfare1.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/1d5f6d/protecting_migrants_welfare1.jpg"},"profile_id":7,"action_count":114,"html_content":"

What is it?

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect everyday life across the globe, workers’ rights have come under fire. With stores, shops, and malls closing their doors to practice social distancing, there has been a global drop in demand for many everyday items. Down the supply chain, many of the workers who produce these items are being laid off, often without pay or compensation for the goods they already produced.
In Bangladesh, many garment manufacturers were not paid for the work they had already completed because of lower global demand. This has led to the firing or furlough of more than one million Bangladeshi garment workers since the start of COVID-19.
The Chinese government also forcibly relocated over 30,000 Muslim Uighurs to keep factories open in COVID-19 affected areas which reflects China’s complete disregard for worker’s rights.
Migrant workers have particularly been impacted by COVID-19. In India, an estimated 139 million internal migrant workers have been impacted. And cross-border migrants, numbering more than 160 million worldwide, have suffered as host countries have not provided adequate protections or deported them. This has been an acute problem in Middle Eastern countries.

Why is it important?

Low wage workers around the world in many sectors have been severely impacted by the sudden impact of COVID-19. Government and company responses have been varied depending on the country, but the most vulnerable of workers in the developing world fear not only for their jobs, but for food security and health.
During a public health crisis, maintaining workers’ rights is just as much the task of the government as it is the companies themselves. When demand unexpectedly drops, both parties should work together to find solutions which value their employees’ rights and compensates them fairly for work already completed.
Consumers should have an awareness of where and how their goods and services come from and adapt purchasing practices to fully respect understand workers’ rights.
Authoritarian regimes are using coronavirus as a means to limit basic rights – freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of the press. In places like Burma (Myanmar) and Cambodia, the governments and local industries are taking advantage of the crisis to suppress unions and workers.

What can you do?

Check out some of the companies with the best business practices and some companies with the worst.
Learn more on workers’ rights from Solidarity Center and the United Nations Global Compact\n

","comment_count":15,"issue_slugs":["quizzes"],"private":false,"created_at":"2020-05-28T13:38:34.314Z","status":"published","snippet":"What is it? As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect everyday life across the globe, workers’ rights have come under fire.","share_count":7,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":4,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2020-05-28T13:56:57.802Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["quizzes"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"New California Law Prohibits Political Deepfakes","id":100,"slug":"100-new-california-law-prohibits-political-deepfakes","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/100-new-california-law-prohibits-political-deepfakes","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=100","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/100/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

California recently became the second state to pass a bill restricting the use of “deepfake” technology to spread false information about political candidates.

Specifically, the bill applies to instances where deepfake technology is used to intentionally spread false information about a candidate within 60 days of an election.

The bill includes exceptions for parody and satire, as well as cases where the broadcaster or publisher makes it clear that the media has been manipulated.

Article: California Becomes The Second State To Restrict Political “Deepfakes”

The bill has already drawn harsh criticism from free speech advocates, including the ACLU, who claimed \"this bill will not solve the problem of deceptive political videos; it will only result in voter confusion, malicious litigation, and repression of free speech.”

It’s worth noting that libel and defamation have never been protected by the first amendment, and many deepfake videos could be classified as libel or defamation.

Do you think outlawing deepfake videos is an attack on the first amendment? Can we stop the spread of misinformation without relying on censorship? Let us know in the comments below.

","user_id":27,"cta_prompt":"Should deepfake videos be considered protected speech?","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"10.22.19","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/843872/WHTT_PoliticalDeepFake_Explore_20191021.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/843872/WHTT_PoliticalDeepFake_Explore_20191021.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/843872/WHTT_PoliticalDeepFake_Explore_20191021.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/843872/WHTT_PoliticalDeepFake_Explore_20191021.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/843872/WHTT_PoliticalDeepFake_Explore_20191021.jpg"},"profile_id":6,"action_count":15,"html_content":"

California recently became the second state to pass a bill restricting the use of “deepfake” technology to spread false information about political candidates.

Specifically, the bill applies to instances where deepfake technology is used to intentionally spread false information about a candidate within 60 days of an election.

The bill includes exceptions for parody and satire, as well as cases where the broadcaster or publisher makes it clear that the media has been manipulated.

Article: California Becomes The Second State To Restrict Political “Deepfakes”

It’s worth noting that libel and defamation have never been protected by the first amendment, and many deepfake videos could be classified as libel or defamation.

Do you think outlawing deepfake videos is an attack on the first amendment? Can we stop the spread of misinformation without relying on censorship? Let us know in the comments below.

","comment_count":3,"issue_slugs":["legislation","news"],"private":null,"created_at":"2019-10-22T14:57:04.556Z","status":"published","snippet":"California recently became the second state to pass a bill restricting the use of “deepfake” technology to spread false","share_count":2,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#9F1962","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":6,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2019-10-22T15:29:37.361Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["legislation","news"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"Congressman Introduces Bill Requiring Arrested Protesters to Pay for Police Overtime","id":89,"slug":"89-congressman-introduces-bill-requiring-arrested-protesters-pay-police-overtime","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/89-congressman-introduces-bill-requiring-arrested-protesters-pay-police-overtime","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=89","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/89/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

Republican Representative Jim Banks responded to September’s climate protests by introducing a bill that would force arrested protestors to pay for police overtime.

Rep. Banks (R-Ind.) said \"Hoosier taxpayers shouldn't be on the hook for illegal protests — it is a violation of their 1st Amendment rights.”

Despite Banks’ statements, such a bill would erode First Amendment protections and make citizens less likely to protest.

Article: GOP lawmaker to introduce bill requiring arrested DC protesters pay for police overtime

Banks claims that this bill would not prohibit other demonstrations or protests, but historically speaking, many of our nation’s most important civil rights victories have come from protests that led to arrests. It seems likely that adding financial responsibility on top of the threat of arrest may prevent would-be-activists from participating in future protests.

Is this an intimidation tactic? If so, is it a violation of our First Amendment rights?

What do you think? Should activists ever be on the hook for police overtime?

","user_id":27,"cta_prompt":"Should protesters have to pay for police? Tell your Rep. how you feel.","cta_type":"contact_reps","cta_text":"Contact Reps","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"10.8.19","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/dc7cc9/WHTT_ArrestedProtestersPayPoliceOvertime_TakeAction_20191007.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/dc7cc9/WHTT_ArrestedProtestersPayPoliceOvertime_TakeAction_20191007.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/dc7cc9/WHTT_ArrestedProtestersPayPoliceOvertime_TakeAction_20191007.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/dc7cc9/WHTT_ArrestedProtestersPayPoliceOvertime_TakeAction_20191007.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/dc7cc9/WHTT_ArrestedProtestersPayPoliceOvertime_TakeAction_20191007.jpg"},"profile_id":5,"action_count":44,"html_content":"

Republican Representative Jim Banks responded to September’s climate protests by introducing a bill that would force arrested protestors to pay for police overtime.

Rep. Banks (R-Ind.) said \"Hoosier taxpayers shouldn't be on the hook for illegal protests — it is a violation of their 1st Amendment rights.”

Despite Banks’ statements, such a bill would erode First Amendment protections and make citizens less likely to protest.

\nArticle: GOP lawmaker to introduce bill requiring arrested DC protesters pay for police overtime\n

Is this an intimidation tactic? If so, is it a violation of our First Amendment rights?

What do you think? Should activists ever be on the hook for police overtime?

","comment_count":4,"issue_slugs":["legislation","news"],"private":null,"created_at":"2019-10-08T16:57:59.427Z","status":"published","snippet":"Republican Representative Jim Banks responded to September’s climate protests by introducing a bill that would force arrested","share_count":13,"reaction_config_id":null,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2019-10-08T17:09:45.576Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["legislation","news"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"One Big Thing: Should China be allowed to host the 2022 Winter Olympics if it’s guilty of genocide against Uighurs?","id":274,"slug":"274-big-thing-china-allowed-host-2022-winter-olympics-s-guilty-genocide-uighurs","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/274-big-thing-china-allowed-host-2022-winter-olympics-s-guilty-genocide-uighurs","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=274","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/274/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

What is it?

New evidence has emerged that that Chinese government has imposed measures to reduce the Uighur population in Xinjiang including pregnancy checks, forced intrauterine devices, sterilization and even abortion. These human rights abuses violate the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
Last month, President Trump signed the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 which authorizes the use of sanctions on Chinese officials directly responsible for the atrocities committed in Xinjiang.

Why is it important?

China has systematically oppressed over a million Muslim Uighurs in “reeducation camps” where they are forced to renounce their religion and pledge loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party.
In just the past year alone, the birthrate in Xinjiang has fallen 24 percent, showing that the CCP’s effort to forcibly reduce Uighur population is working. Historically, the global community has put a stop to regimes who are systematically incarcerating and eradicating a religious minority in the way the CCP is currently doing.
Many have claimed that due to the human rights violations its committed, China should not be allowed to hold the 2022 Winter Olympics on top of having individual CCP officials sanctioned.

What can you do?

Here’s more information from The Uyghur Human Rights Project.
Learn more about the CCP’s campaign of demographic genocide from Jamestown Foundation and AP reports
See Congress’s bipartisan statement pressing the Administration to address the forced serializations.

","user_id":1095,"cta_prompt":"Join us and take our poll","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"7.7.20","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/39ea78/UyghurDetentionCamp.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/39ea78/UyghurDetentionCamp.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/39ea78/UyghurDetentionCamp.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/39ea78/UyghurDetentionCamp.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/39ea78/UyghurDetentionCamp.jpg"},"profile_id":4,"action_count":179,"html_content":"

What is it?

New evidence has emerged that that Chinese government has imposed measures to reduce the Uighur population in Xinjiang including pregnancy checks, forced intrauterine devices, sterilization and even abortion. These human rights abuses violate the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
Last month, President Trump signed the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 which authorizes the use of sanctions on Chinese officials directly responsible for the atrocities committed in Xinjiang.

Why is it important?

\nChina has systematically oppressed over a million Muslim Uighurs in “reeducation camps” where they are forced to renounce their religion and pledge loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party.
In just the past year alone, the birthrate in Xinjiang has fallen 24 percent, showing that the CCP’s effort to forcibly reduce Uighur population is working. Historically, the global community has put a stop to regimes who are systematically incarcerating and eradicating a religious minority in the way the CCP is currently doing.
Many have claimed that due to the human rights violations its committed, China should not be allowed to hold the 2022 Winter Olympics on top of having individual CCP officials sanctioned.

What can you do?

Here’s more information from The Uyghur Human Rights Project.
Learn more about the CCP’s campaign of demographic genocide from Jamestown Foundation and AP reports\n
See Congress’s bipartisan statement pressing the Administration to address the forced serializations.

","comment_count":33,"issue_slugs":["quizzes"],"private":false,"created_at":"2020-07-07T20:38:45.091Z","status":"published","snippet":"What is it? New evidence has emerged that that Chinese government has imposed measures to reduce the Uighur population in","share_count":13,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#9F1962","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":6,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2020-07-07T20:47:21.954Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["quizzes"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"Can South Korea serve as an example to the United States on how to run an election during COVID-19?","id":208,"slug":"208-south-korea-serve-example-united-states-run-election-covid-19","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/208-south-korea-serve-example-united-states-run-election-covid-19","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=208","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/208/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

What is it?

On April 15, South Korea will go ahead with its parliamentary election despite the global COVID-19 outbreak. In order to ensure the safety of its citizens, the South Korean government has disinfected over 14,000 polling stations and marked 3-foot intervals to make sure that voters practice social distancing.
South Korea and the U.S. confirmed their first COVID-19 cases within a day of each other but today the U.S. has the most confirmed cases globally while South Korea has barely surpassed 10,000.

Why is it important?

Forty-seven countries including the United Kingdom, France and Ethiopia have postponed their elections but South Korea provides some important lessons to other democracies like the United states who are considering how to proceed with their elections.
As governments prepare to hold elections amid COVID-19, campaigns must make similar adjustments. In South Korea candidates took their campaigns online and engaged with their constituents in creative ways which practiced social distancing.
One thing to note is that online campaigning risks marginalizing people who have little or no access to internet services. Also, in countries with state-run media and internet services, opposition parties often have a difficult time taking their campaign online.

What can you do?

Check out 5 things governments should be doing in Freedom House’s Principles for Protecting Civil and Political Rights in the Fight against Covid-19.
Check out some best practices from South Korea’s experience dealing with COVID-19 from Foreign Affairs

","user_id":1095,"cta_prompt":"Vote and share your thoughts & comments below!","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"4.23.20","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/36a6cb/200413082556-05-pandemic-election-exlarge-169-1.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/36a6cb/200413082556-05-pandemic-election-exlarge-169-1.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/36a6cb/200413082556-05-pandemic-election-exlarge-169-1.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/36a6cb/200413082556-05-pandemic-election-exlarge-169-1.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/36a6cb/200413082556-05-pandemic-election-exlarge-169-1.jpg"},"profile_id":7,"action_count":20,"html_content":"

What is it?

On April 15, South Korea will go ahead with its parliamentary election despite the global COVID-19 outbreak. In order to ensure the safety of its citizens, the South Korean government has disinfected over 14,000 polling stations and marked 3-foot intervals to make sure that voters practice social distancing.
South Korea and the U.S. confirmed their first COVID-19 cases within a day of each other but today the U.S. has the most confirmed cases globally while South Korea has barely surpassed 10,000.

Why is it important?

\nForty-seven countries including the United Kingdom, France and Ethiopia have postponed their elections but South Korea provides some important lessons to other democracies like the United states who are considering how to proceed with their elections.
As governments prepare to hold elections amid COVID-19, campaigns must make similar adjustments. In South Korea candidates took their campaigns online and engaged with their constituents in creative ways which practiced social distancing.
One thing to note is that online campaigning risks marginalizing people who have little or no access to internet services. Also, in countries with state-run media and internet services, opposition parties often have a difficult time taking their campaign online.

What can you do?

Check out 5 things governments should be doing in Freedom House’s Principles for Protecting Civil and Political Rights in the Fight against Covid-19.
Check out some best practices from South Korea’s experience dealing with COVID-19 from Foreign Affairs\n

","comment_count":5,"issue_slugs":[],"private":false,"created_at":"2020-04-23T15:09:39.631Z","status":"published","snippet":"What is it? On April 15, South Korea will go ahead with its parliamentary election despite the global COVID-19 outbreak. In","share_count":0,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#9F1962","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":6,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2020-04-23T15:09:39.627Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":[],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"Denver Police Agree to First Amendment Training ","id":96,"slug":"96-denver-police-agree-amendment-training","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/96-denver-police-agree-amendment-training","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=96","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/96/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

In July of 2018, investigative reporter Susan Greene filmed an interaction between Denver police and a naked, handcuffed man. Police asked Greene to stop recording, and when she refused, they seized her phone, handcuffed her, and pushed her into a police car. The interaction was captured on police body cam footage.

Article: Denver Police Agree to First Amendment Training After Unlawful Arrest of Journalist

The right to record police officers have been repeatedly upheld by the courts as an essential element of free speech and free press.

After a 7 month internal investigation, the Denver Police Department agreed to provide First Amendment training for their officers, specifically conceding the right to photograph and record in public.

Is this a win for free speech? Let us know in the comments below.

","user_id":27,"cta_prompt":"Should recording police count as free speech?","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"10.15.19","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/f749d3/WHTT_DenverPoliceFirstAmendmentTraining-_Explore_20191014.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/f749d3/WHTT_DenverPoliceFirstAmendmentTraining-_Explore_20191014.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/f749d3/WHTT_DenverPoliceFirstAmendmentTraining-_Explore_20191014.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/f749d3/WHTT_DenverPoliceFirstAmendmentTraining-_Explore_20191014.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/f749d3/WHTT_DenverPoliceFirstAmendmentTraining-_Explore_20191014.jpg"},"profile_id":6,"action_count":11,"html_content":"

\nArticle: Denver Police Agree to First Amendment Training After Unlawful Arrest of Journalist\n

The right to record police officers have been repeatedly upheld by the courts as an essential element of free speech and free press.

Is this a win for free speech? Let us know in the comments below.

","comment_count":1,"issue_slugs":["legislation","news"],"private":null,"created_at":"2019-10-15T14:12:16.231Z","status":"published","snippet":"In July of 2018, investigative reporter Susan Greene filmed an interaction between Denver police and a naked, handcuffed man.","share_count":2,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#9F1962","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":6,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2019-10-15T14:16:52.981Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["legislation","news"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"One Year After Jamal Khashoggi’s Death, Many Questions Remain","id":85,"slug":"85-year-jamal-khashoggi-s-death-questions-remain","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/85-year-jamal-khashoggi-s-death-questions-remain","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=85","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/85/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

Wednesday, October 2nd marks one year since journalist Jamal Khashoggi died inside the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul, Turkey. Khashoggi was a known political dissident, and many of his articles were critical of the Saudi government. The exact circumstances of his murder remain suspicious and largely unverified, and one year later, there are still many questions surrounding his death.

Here’s what you need to know about Khashoggi:

Jamal Ahmad Khashoggi was a Saudi born author, journalist and political dissident.
He was assassinated on October 2nd, 2018 inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.
Khashoggi was a legal resident of the United States, and a columnist for the Washington Post at the time of his death.
Saudi Arabia initially denied any knowledge of Khashoggi's death.
Later, the Saudi government claimed his death was the result of rogue actors.
By November, the CIA had concluded Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman ordered Khashoggi's assassination.
A United Nation’s Report concluded that he was killed and dismembered by Saudi state actors.
His remains have never been found.
Initially, President Trump promised “severe punishment” if it became clear that the Saudi government had assassinated Khashoggi. One month later, he backpedaled on this claim, citing his reluctance to “destroy the economy” by straining Saudi-U.S. relations.
A trial for 11 men accused of killing Khashoggi began in January, 2019 but has taken place in Saudi Arabia, mostly outside of public view.
Last week, Saudi Crown Prince admitted that Khashoggi’s death “happened under my watch.”
Mohammed bin Salman still denies ordering the killing of Khashoggi.

Article: Khashoggi's murder: One year on, here's what we know

Even after multiple investigations and a Saudi trial, the exact details of the murder are still unknown. Khashoggi’s murder is a brutal blow to global press freedoms and an alarming strain to U.S.-Saudi relations. People deserve to know the truth about what happened to Jamal Khashoggi, and as long as the Saudi government and the White House continue to shroud this event in secrecy, people will continue to harbor suspicions about our government’s willingness to pursue justice and our democratic commitment to a free press.

Do you think Congress should demand an investigation into Khashoggi’s death? If so, let your Representative know.

You can also sound off on twitter using the hashtags #JusticeforKhashoggi and #RememberKhashoggi

Or, you can reach out to the 2020 Presidential candidates below using #JusticeforKhashoggi and #RememberKhashoggi

","user_id":27,"cta_prompt":"Do you think Congress Should Reopen an Investigation?","cta_type":"contact_reps","cta_text":"Contact Reps","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"10.2.19","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/d363a5/WHTT_CountablePetition_20190926.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/d363a5/WHTT_CountablePetition_20190926.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/d363a5/WHTT_CountablePetition_20190926.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/d363a5/WHTT_CountablePetition_20190926.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/d363a5/WHTT_CountablePetition_20190926.jpg"},"profile_id":5,"action_count":18,"html_content":"

Here’s what you need to know about Khashoggi:

Jamal Ahmad Khashoggi was a Saudi born author, journalist and political dissident.
He was assassinated on October 2nd, 2018 inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.
Khashoggi was a legal resident of the United States, and a columnist for the Washington Post at the time of his death.
Saudi Arabia initially denied any knowledge of Khashoggi's death.
Later, the Saudi government claimed his death was the result of rogue actors.
\nBy November, the CIA had concluded Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman ordered Khashoggi's assassination.\n
A United Nation’s Report concluded that he was killed and dismembered by Saudi state actors.
His remains have never been found.
\nInitially, President Trump promised “severe punishment” if it became clear that the Saudi government had assassinated Khashoggi. One month later, he backpedaled on this claim, citing his reluctance to “destroy the economy” by straining Saudi-U.S. relations.\n
\nA trial for 11 men accused of killing Khashoggi began in January, 2019 but has taken place in Saudi Arabia, mostly outside of public view.\n
\nLast week, Saudi Crown Prince admitted that Khashoggi’s death “happened under my watch.”\n
\nMohammed bin Salman still denies ordering the killing of Khashoggi.\n

Article: Khashoggi's murder: One year on, here's what we know

Do you think Congress should demand an investigation into Khashoggi’s death? If so, let your Representative know.

You can also sound off on twitter using the hashtags #JusticeforKhashoggi and #RememberKhashoggi

Or, you can reach out to the 2020 Presidential candidates below using #JusticeforKhashoggi and #RememberKhashoggi

","comment_count":1,"issue_slugs":["news"],"private":null,"created_at":"2019-10-02T15:59:54.482Z","status":"published","snippet":"Wednesday, October 2nd marks one year since journalist Jamal Khashoggi died inside the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul, Turkey.","share_count":5,"reaction_config_id":null,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2019-10-02T16:04:51.013Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["news"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"One Big Thing: Do you agree with today’s Supreme Court decision regarding the electoral college?","id":273,"slug":"273-big-thing-do-agree-today-s-supreme-court-decision-regarding-electoral-college","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/273-big-thing-do-agree-today-s-supreme-court-decision-regarding-electoral-college","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=273","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/273/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

What is it?

On Monday, July 6, the Supreme Court ruled to uphold states’ laws which prohibit their representatives at the electoral college from voting against their constituents’ wishes. This is known as the “Faithless Elector” and there was growing concern ahead of November’s general election.
At the center of the debate is the issue of the electoral college results versus the popular vote results in a presidential election.

Why is it important?

Historically, the electoral college has been a defining feature of the American democratic process and often insignificant.
However, in the past five elections, two elections (2000 & 2016) resulted when the loser won the popular vote, while the winner won the electoral college. This was particular salient when President Donald Trump won the electoral college in 2016 and Hilary Clinton won the popular vote. This sparked a debate over the electoral college’s current effectiveness as some voices have called for a change in electoral systems.
The Supreme Court’s decision is an important measure to ensure electoral integrity in the lead up to the 2020 elections as it legally guards against electors from taking measures into their own hands. It prevents rogue delegates from misrepresenting their constituents’ decisions, thus ensuring that voters’ decisions are upheld.
Yet, the debate remains. Take a look at both sides of the debate about the electoral college and decide for yourself:

Arguments for: The New York Times, Vox

Arguments Against: CATO Institute, The Washington Post

What can you do?

Make sure to register vote: vote.gov
Learn more about the constitutional history of the electoral college from the National Archives

","user_id":1095,"cta_prompt":"Join us and take our poll","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"7.6.20","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/4c7ef3/votes-college-state.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/4c7ef3/votes-college-state.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/4c7ef3/votes-college-state.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/4c7ef3/votes-college-state.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/4c7ef3/votes-college-state.jpg"},"profile_id":4,"action_count":163,"html_content":"

What is it?

On Monday, July 6, the Supreme Court ruled to uphold states’ laws which prohibit their representatives at the electoral college from voting against their constituents’ wishes. This is known as the “Faithless Elector” and there was growing concern ahead of November’s general election.
At the center of the debate is the issue of the electoral college results versus the popular vote results in a presidential election.

Why is it important?

Historically, the electoral college has been a defining feature of the American democratic process and often insignificant.
However, in the past five elections, two elections (2000 & 2016) resulted when the loser won the popular vote, while the winner won the electoral college. This was particular salient when President Donald Trump won the electoral college in 2016 and Hilary Clinton won the popular vote. This sparked a debate over the electoral college’s current effectiveness as some voices have called for a change in electoral systems.\n
The Supreme Court’s decision is an important measure to ensure electoral integrity in the lead up to the 2020 elections as it legally guards against electors from taking measures into their own hands. It prevents rogue delegates from misrepresenting their constituents’ decisions, thus ensuring that voters’ decisions are upheld.
Yet, the debate remains. Take a look at both sides of the debate about the electoral college and decide for yourself:

Arguments for: The New York Times, Vox

Arguments Against: CATO Institute, The Washington Post

What can you do?

Make sure to register vote: vote.gov\n
\nLearn more about the constitutional history of the electoral college from the National Archives\n

","comment_count":26,"issue_slugs":["quizzes"],"private":false,"created_at":"2020-07-07T00:45:00.813Z","status":"published","snippet":"What is it? On Monday, July 6, the Supreme Court ruled to uphold states’ laws which prohibit their representatives at the","share_count":10,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#9F1962","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":6,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2020-07-07T00:49:34.810Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["quizzes"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"Should the World Health Organization be criticized for its response to coronavirus and its relationship with China and Taiwan?","id":207,"slug":"207-world-health-organization-criticized-response-coronavirus-relationship-china-taiwan","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/207-world-health-organization-criticized-response-coronavirus-relationship-china-taiwan","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=207","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/207/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

What is it?

On Tuesday, April 7, President Trump attacked the World Health Organization (WHO) for its late response to the COVID-19 global pandemic. He is not alone as the New York Times details the 3 ways that the WHO mismanaged its COVID-19 response in relation to China and Taiwan.
The WHO also refuses to acknowledge Taiwan’s existence as a sovereign country, a policy it continued last weekend when a top WHO official appeared to avoid questions about Taiwan. The WHO also continues to classify Taiwan under China’s borders on its website.

Why is it important?

The WHO has existed since April 7, 1948. It plays a crucial role supporting developing countries’ health needs and has played an important role in providing emergency responses to global health issues for more than 70 years – smallpox, AIDS, SARS, Ebola, MERs, Polio, etc.
In recent years, WHO has come under criticism especially with relation to China’s growing influence and the Unites States’ diminishing sway. Many observers (political and nonpolitical) see this influence as evidenced by WHO’s Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus responses to China’s handling of the pandemic.
Several experts have argued that the WHO’s declaration of a public health crisis on March 11 was too late. This limited many countries’ preventative responses including quarantine mechanisms and preparing hospitals.
The WHO’s questionable response to China’s mishandling of the COVID-19 outbreak has diminished the organization’s credibility. Prioritizing science over politics is needed in order to curb the global pandemic and restore its international reputation.

What can you do?

Learn more about the WHO’s response to COVID-19 from the Council on Foreign Relations and keep track of the virus’s spread from the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center.

","user_id":1095,"cta_prompt":"Join us and share your thoughts!","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"4.23.20","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/b9f2a6/who-hq-e1586353803480-1.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/b9f2a6/who-hq-e1586353803480-1.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/b9f2a6/who-hq-e1586353803480-1.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/b9f2a6/who-hq-e1586353803480-1.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/b9f2a6/who-hq-e1586353803480-1.jpg"},"profile_id":7,"action_count":4,"html_content":"

What is it?

On Tuesday, April 7, President Trump attacked the World Health Organization (WHO) for its late response to the COVID-19 global pandemic. He is not alone as the New York Times details the 3 ways that the WHO mismanaged its COVID-19 response in relation to China and Taiwan.
The WHO also refuses to acknowledge Taiwan’s existence as a sovereign country, a policy it continued last weekend when a top WHO official appeared to avoid questions about Taiwan. The WHO also continues to classify Taiwan under China’s borders on its website.

Why is it important?

The WHO has existed since April 7, 1948. It plays a crucial role supporting developing countries’ health needs and has played an important role in providing emergency responses to global health issues for more than 70 years – smallpox, AIDS, SARS, Ebola, MERs, Polio, etc.
In recent years, WHO has come under criticism especially with relation to China’s growing influence and the Unites States’ diminishing sway. Many observers (political and nonpolitical) see this influence as evidenced by WHO’s Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus responses to China’s handling of the pandemic.
Several experts have argued that the WHO’s declaration of a public health crisis on March 11 was too late. This limited many countries’ preventative responses including quarantine mechanisms and preparing hospitals.
The WHO’s questionable response to China’s mishandling of the COVID-19 outbreak has diminished the organization’s credibility. Prioritizing science over politics is needed in order to curb the global pandemic and restore its international reputation.

What can you do?

Learn more about the WHO’s response to COVID-19 from the Council on Foreign Relations and keep track of the virus’s spread from the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center.

","comment_count":2,"issue_slugs":[],"private":false,"created_at":"2020-04-23T14:56:35.406Z","status":"published","snippet":"What is it? On Tuesday, April 7, President Trump attacked the World Health Organization (WHO) for its late response to the","share_count":0,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#9F1962","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":6,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2020-04-23T14:56:35.404Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":[],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"Should Political Robo Calls Be Protected Under the First Amendment?","id":84,"slug":"84-political-robo-calls-protected-amendment","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/84-political-robo-calls-protected-amendment","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=84","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/84/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

Spam calls are annoying, but they may be an important part of a functioning democracy, at least according to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. A Montana judge recently ruled that part of an old Montana law is unconstitutional for banning robo calls that are \"promoting a political campaign or any use related to a political campaign.”

The court reasoned that banning robo calls might severely damage campaigns with low funding and therefore posed a dangerous restriction on free speech.

Article: Are Political Robocalls Protected Under the First Amendment?

It’s nice to see a court stick up for campaigns that don’t have access to Super PACs, even if it comes at the expense of a minor annoyance.

What do you think? Is this a win for free speech or a loss for privacy? Can it be both?

","user_id":27,"cta_prompt":"Do you think auto calls should be classified as protected speech?","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"10.1.19","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/91ecff/WHTT_PoliticalRoboCall_Explore_20190930.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/91ecff/WHTT_PoliticalRoboCall_Explore_20190930.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/91ecff/WHTT_PoliticalRoboCall_Explore_20190930.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/91ecff/WHTT_PoliticalRoboCall_Explore_20190930.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/91ecff/WHTT_PoliticalRoboCall_Explore_20190930.jpg"},"profile_id":6,"action_count":9,"html_content":"

The court reasoned that banning robo calls might severely damage campaigns with low funding and therefore posed a dangerous restriction on free speech.

\nArticle: Are Political Robocalls Protected Under the First Amendment?\n

It’s nice to see a court stick up for campaigns that don’t have access to Super PACs, even if it comes at the expense of a minor annoyance.

What do you think? Is this a win for free speech or a loss for privacy? Can it be both?

","comment_count":1,"issue_slugs":["news","legislation"],"private":null,"created_at":"2019-10-01T16:41:52.041Z","status":"published","snippet":"Spam calls are annoying, but they may be an important part of a functioning democracy, at least according to the 9th Circuit","share_count":0,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#9F1962","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":6,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2019-10-01T16:41:52.037Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["legislation","news"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"How big was the global climate strike?","id":81,"slug":"81-big-global-climate-strike","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/81-big-global-climate-strike","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=81","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/81/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

The numbers are in from what was likely the largest climate strike in history. On Friday, September 20th, an estimated 4 million activists gathered in over 160 countries to protest a lack of corporate and government action on climate change. The exact numbers have not yet been confirmed, but current estimates place over 250,000 protestors at the main strike in New York City, as well as over 300,000 protestors in London and 1.4 million protestors across Germany.

Article: How big was the global climate strike? 4 million people, activists estimate.

The New York demonstration was a powerful reminder of the importance of our right to gather, speak out, and hold our elected officials accountable.

Do you agree with the protest? If so, how would you like to see Congress address our changing climate? Reach out to your Rep. by clicking the link above or let us know how you feel in the comments below.

","user_id":27,"cta_prompt":"Do you want to see more government action to address climate change? Tell your Representatives how you feel.","cta_type":"contact_reps","cta_text":"Contact Reps","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"10.1.19","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/f76edb/WHTT_GlobalClimateStrike_TakeAction_20190930.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/f76edb/WHTT_GlobalClimateStrike_TakeAction_20190930.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/f76edb/WHTT_GlobalClimateStrike_TakeAction_20190930.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/f76edb/WHTT_GlobalClimateStrike_TakeAction_20190930.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/f76edb/WHTT_GlobalClimateStrike_TakeAction_20190930.jpg"},"profile_id":5,"action_count":5,"html_content":"

\nArticle: How big was the global climate strike? 4 million people, activists estimate.\n

The New York demonstration was a powerful reminder of the importance of our right to gather, speak out, and hold our elected officials accountable.

","comment_count":2,"issue_slugs":["news","legislation"],"private":null,"created_at":"2019-09-26T01:30:41.261Z","status":"published","snippet":"The numbers are in from what was likely the largest climate strike in history. On Friday, September 20th, an estimated 4 million","share_count":0,"reaction_config_id":null,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2019-10-01T16:49:48.439Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["legislation","news"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"Flashback Fourth of July: Senator John McCain","id":272,"slug":"272-flashback-fourth-july-senator-john-mccain","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/272-flashback-fourth-july-senator-john-mccain","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=272","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/272/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

Each year, U.S. Senator John McCain celebrated the Fourth of July overseas with our nation's service members stationed abroad. On July 4, 2017, Senator McCain visited troops in Kabul, Afghanistan and released the following statement:

\"These brave individuals epitomize love of country, forged by generations of Americans who came before them to fight and die for freedom. They have dedicated themselves to securing the liberties we so often take for granted, but that make our nation what it is today – a beacon of hope to all people held captive by oppression, violence and intolerance. As we celebrate Independence Day, may we show our gratitude and keep in our prayers the brave and selfless patriots serving around the world and their families, who shoulder our burdens every day to protect our freedom and keep us safe from harm.”

U.S. Senator John McCain with U.S. service members at Camp Resolute in Kabul, Afghanistan on July 4, 2017

","user_id":1095,"cta_prompt":"Happy 4th of July!","cta_type":"share","cta_text":"Share","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"7.4.20","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/e47797/index.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/e47797/index.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/e47797/index.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/e47797/index.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/e47797/index.jpg"},"profile_id":4,"action_count":48,"html_content":"

U.S. Senator John McCain with U.S. service members at Camp Resolute in Kabul, Afghanistan on July 4, 2017

","comment_count":7,"issue_slugs":["quotes"],"private":false,"created_at":"2020-07-03T16:48:32.092Z","status":"published","snippet":"Each year, U.S. Senator John McCain celebrated the Fourth of July overseas with our nation's service members stationed abroad.","share_count":29,"reaction_config_id":null,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2020-07-04T18:07:21.486Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["quotes"],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"One Big Thing: America Votes in the Shadow of Coronavirus","id":206,"slug":"206-big-thing-america-votes-shadow-coronavirus","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/206-big-thing-america-votes-shadow-coronavirus","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=206","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/206/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

What is it?

As Coronavirus (COVID-19) looms over all aspects of society, state and national election officials must still determine how to proceed with the remaining presidential primary elections, Congressional & state level primary elections, and general elections on November 3.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, more than 20 states need to hold presidential primary elections and many more will have to hold primary elections for state level offices and Congressional seats.
Different voting options are common around the country, but many states would need to quickly implement new voting procedures if coronavirus continues to November – even sooner with on-going primaries.
Absentee mail-in voting is common, but different states have different rules.
The cost of new measures to ensure voters have access to polls is going to be expensive – keep in mind security measures needed to protect against foreign interference as well.

Why is it important?

Voting is essential to a strong American democracy. It is vital that there are functional alternative voting methods in place for all registered voters if the coronavirus pandemic continues to persist. The overall success the election depends on the mutual cooperation of the American public to adapt to a new method of voting.
This is a non-partisan issue. As the Campaign Legal Center has advocated “red” and “blue” states have an obligation to ensure all people have access to voting.
As mentioned above, Congress already allocated $500 million to support elections, but in a Politico article, experts believe more is needed.
Disenfranchising voters is not an option. In a Techcruch article written by a state elections official, secure online voting should be considered to ensure voters have options.
Voters need options: mail-in, online or even drop it off at a drive up location.

What can you do?

Check out legislation in the U.S. Senate aimed to make mail-in voting widely available and appropriates $500 million to help election officials around the country prepare.
Check your state’s primary election dates from National Conference of State Legislatures.
Make sure you are registered to vote and sign up online from Vote.gov

","user_id":1095,"cta_prompt":"Do think more funding is necessary to ensure on-time, secure and safe voting for the November general election?","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"4.23.20","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/b005d5/ap_mail_ballot-1.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/b005d5/ap_mail_ballot-1.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/b005d5/ap_mail_ballot-1.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/b005d5/ap_mail_ballot-1.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/mE5aaeKj/b005d5/ap_mail_ballot-1.jpg"},"profile_id":7,"action_count":0,"html_content":"

What is it?

As Coronavirus (COVID-19) looms over all aspects of society, state and national election officials must still determine how to proceed with the remaining presidential primary elections, Congressional & state level primary elections, and general elections on November 3.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, more than 20 states need to hold presidential primary elections and many more will have to hold primary elections for state level offices and Congressional seats.
Different voting options are common around the country, but many states would need to quickly implement new voting procedures if coronavirus continues to November – even sooner with on-going primaries.
Absentee mail-in voting is common, but different states have different rules.
The cost of new measures to ensure voters have access to polls is going to be expensive – keep in mind security measures needed to protect against foreign interference as well.

Why is it important?

Voting is essential to a strong American democracy. It is vital that there are functional alternative voting methods in place for all registered voters if the coronavirus pandemic continues to persist. The overall success the election depends on the mutual cooperation of the American public to adapt to a new method of voting.
This is a non-partisan issue. As the Campaign Legal Center has advocated “red” and “blue” states have an obligation to ensure all people have access to voting.
As mentioned above, Congress already allocated $500 million to support elections, but in a Politico article, experts believe more is needed.
Disenfranchising voters is not an option. In a Techcruch article written by a state elections official, secure online voting should be considered to ensure voters have options.
Voters need options: mail-in, online or even drop it off at a drive up location.

What can you do?

Check out legislation in the U.S. Senate aimed to make mail-in voting widely available and appropriates $500 million to help election officials around the country prepare.
Check your state’s primary election dates from National Conference of State Legislatures.
Make sure you are registered to vote and sign up online from Vote.gov\n

","comment_count":0,"issue_slugs":[],"private":false,"created_at":"2020-04-23T14:54:33.318Z","status":"published","snippet":"What is it? As Coronavirus (COVID-19) looms over all aspects of society, state and national election officials must still","share_count":0,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#9F1962","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":6,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2020-04-23T14:54:33.314Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":[],"legislator_ids":[]},{"title":"Can Service Solve America’s Biggest National Security Threat?","id":79,"slug":"79-service-solve-america-s-biggest-national-security-threat","links":{"self":"https://www.weholdthesetruths.org/articles/79-service-solve-america-s-biggest-national-security-threat","article_comments":"/api/article_comments?article_id=79","signatures":"/api/v3/articles/79/signatures?include=user"},"content":"

$\"\"$

For many Americans, trust in American Institutions and with one-another is at an all time low. This lack of trust is one of our nation’s most pressing national security crises. Bishop Garrison and Mary Beth Bruggeman of Thrive Global believe that universal national service is critical to the future and security of our country.

Article: How to solve America’s biggest national security threat

Studies have shown that service can increase empathy as well as build teamwork skills and foster a sense of community. By serving side-by-side in the military, civilian corps, or in public works projects, Americans may be able to start rebuilding trust in each other and in our nation.

Do you think we can rebuild faith in our institutions and each other through increased national service? Why or why not? How would you like to see our nation focus on service?

This article is based on a piece originally published in Thrive Global.

","user_id":27,"cta_prompt":"Do you support increased national service?","cta_type":"reactions","cta_text":"React","cta_url":null,"formatted_publish_date":"9.24.19","image_urls":{"thumb":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/6dc483/WHTT_UniversalNationalService_Explore_20190923.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/6dc483/WHTT_UniversalNationalService_Explore_20190923.jpg","small":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/6dc483/WHTT_UniversalNationalService_Explore_20190923.jpg","medium":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/6dc483/WHTT_UniversalNationalService_Explore_20190923.jpg","large":"https://ul.weholdthesetruths.org/ul/q_auto/WvoqklEb/6dc483/WHTT_UniversalNationalService_Explore_20190923.jpg"},"profile_id":6,"action_count":14,"html_content":"

$\"\"$

Article: How to solve America’s biggest national security threat

Do you think we can rebuild faith in our institutions and each other through increased national service? Why or why not? How would you like to see our nation focus on service?

This article is based on a piece originally published in Thrive Global.

","comment_count":2,"issue_slugs":["news"],"private":null,"created_at":"2019-09-24T05:45:01.079Z","status":"published","snippet":"For many Americans, trust in American Institutions and with one-another is at an all time low. This lack of trust is one of our","share_count":3,"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#333373","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#9F1962","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#DB0F06","stance":"no"}],"reaction_config_id":6,"recipient_config":null,"show_newsletter_signup":false,"show_byline_follow_button":true,"show_suggested_profiles":false,"published_at":"2019-09-24T16:33:25.855Z","allow_advocacy":true,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"twitter_share_language":null,"email_share_subject":null,"email_share_body":null,"issue_ids":["news"],"legislator_ids":[]}],"meta":{"pagination":{"current_page":1,"total_pages":12,"total_count":236}}}

Comment Liked by 1 User